TECHNET Archives

December 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:00:05 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (76 lines)
At 09:17 AM 11/30/2005, Peter Lee wrote:
>Hello Technet,
>
>Does anyone have experience with utilizing conductive via fill on PCB for
>heat dissipation?

Yes, lots of experience.
Key words: added expense, little if any benefit, additional leadtime and
risk of delam/assembly scrap

Risk:
Beware of overplated conductive fill in closely packed thermal via farms.
Materials like CB100 are just enough more expansive to do some serious
lifting/separation of surface copper.  Ormet's conductive material is an
entirely different wonderful thing -- it really works well but very few
fabs know how to work with it.


Limited Efficacy:
Most conductive via fills like CB100 don't help much at all w/ thermal
conductivity. Do a x-section for a view of the metal to metal contacts and
you'll see why.  The more granular fills (e.g. Taiyo, Methode might do a
little better).

Recommendation:
Pack your thermal vias as tight as your fabricator says is safe and
standback in amazement at how well copper conducts.

Next step up in complexity is to add another mil or so of annular copper to
your finished via.You'll get as much (or more) total conductivity than with
conductive fill w/out the expense, additional leadtime and risk of delam.

Just don't spec too addmuch copper or you'll dogbone the vias shut and risk
entrapped air lifting pads during reflow (been there, done that).

my $.02,
dw

>  How mature is the technology?

depends on the fabricator.

>Is there any shortcoming/impact on the overall design and manufacturing
>process?

Yes, see comments above.

>Comment is greatly appreciated.
>
>Rgds,
>Peter
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
>[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
>847-615-7100 ext.2815
>-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2