TECHNET Archives

November 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard
Date:
Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:59:25 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Without the plug, the solder from the sphere can wet down into the
adjacent via to the backside of the pwb during reflow.
On a dogbone pattern, with one side the pad and the other side the
connecting via, the small soldermask dam that goes over the thinnest
part of the dogbone pattern is not enough to stop the solder wicking.
The solder will wick right under that flimsy little dam, and the via
will rob the solder. This is called solder thieving. The soldermask plug
prevents that from happening. If you ever need to rework that BGA, the
site prep operation nearly always makes the little soldermask dam worse,
and after you replace the part you get even more solder thieving, and
the entire rework/X-ray/test/rework cycle spins on down into a black
hole called scrap. One almost never sees BGAs with daisychained dogbones
without the soldermask plug, and that is a good thing, as Martha says.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Black, Paul
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 7:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Plugging vias necessary?

Hi Everyone,

I have a board with a 357 pin PBGA. Each pad has a short etch leading to
an adjacent via. Currently, the fabrication drawing calls for each via
to be plugged. The assembly process for this board does not contain a
wave solder step and the test engineer assures me that plugging the vias
is not necessary for vacuum during incircuit testing, so is there some
other reason for plugging these vias? They are plugged with soldermask,
and I feel like we are unnecessarily introducing potential problems into
the process.

Thanks in advance for your opinions.

Paul Black
Manufacturing Engineer
Kronos
[log in to unmask]

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2