TECHNET Archives

November 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David D. Hillman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:07:30 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (177 lines)
Hi folks! Just couldn't sit on my hands any longer. There is couple of
different camps out in the industry right now: 1) Bi is ok; 2) Bi is not
ok. I happen to fall in the (2) category due to type of electronics I work
on - avionics. The JCAA/JGPP consortia is in the middle of failure analysis
of a very large test program. Some of the initial data was reported at the
SMTAI conference in September. The test data definitively shows that small
amounts of Pb and Bi mixing has a detrimental impact on the solder joint
integrity under IPC Class 3 product testing parameters. As part of the
upcoming APEX show the will be additional data available for industry
review on the impact of Bi.  The misinformation that is currently found in
the industry that Bi containing solder alloys or Bi containing component
finishes have no impact on solder joint reliability is incorrect. There are
many IPC Class 2 products where Bi containing solder alloys or Bi
containing component finishes will be perfectly acceptable - the product
design team needs to do their homework to understand how the Bi solder
joint induced integrity degradation will impact their design. As Richard
pointed out - there is additional discussion on this topic in the TechNet
archives.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]




             Richard
             Kraszewski
             <[log in to unmask]                                          To
             COM>                      [log in to unmask]
             Sent by: TechNet                                           cc
             <[log in to unmask]>
                                                                   Subject
                                       Re: [TN] SnBi Lead Plating
             11/02/2005 09:22
             AM


             Please respond to
              TechNet E-Mail
                   Forum
             <[log in to unmask]>
             ; Please respond
                    to
                  Richard
                Kraszewski
             <[log in to unmask]
                   COM>






Lots of information in the archives on this topic which is why I think
no one else responded.

To my way of thinking, it boils down to that with a low Bi (<4%Bi) alloy
its extremely unlikely that any issue will occur, but difficult to
adequately remove this concern from most peoples minds.

In case you haven't seen it already you may find the attached linked
document informative.

http://www.cel.com/pdf/marcomnews/japan_best.pdf


Rich K / KEDS


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Burke
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 4:48 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] SnBi Lead Plating

Not a mis-communication, it seems to be used a lot for memory devices
particularly.

John

------------------------------------
Avanex
John Burke
Senior Manager RoHS Compliance
[log in to unmask]
40919 Encyclopedia Circle
Fremont
CA 94538
tel: 510 897 4250
fax: 510 979 0189
mobile: 510 676 6312
------------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Bob Barr
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 1:33 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] SnBi Lead Plating


We received a last time buy notice from a distributor for a NEC part.
The
part is going to a RoHS compliant finish. The information we received
seems to indicate the lead finish will be SnBi. With the transition from
Pb to Pb-free still happening, it seems like a problem to have Bi on a
component lead. Everything I have read says Bi cannot be mixed with Pb
because it forms a low temperature melting alloy. Has anybody heard of
Bi
being used in a component lead finish? I'm hoping this may just be a
mis-
communication.

Thanks.

Bob

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2