TECHNET Archives

November 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Greig <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Greig <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:39:31 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (109 lines)
Just be glad that 3.9.4 isn't "Lead Removal" 


Best Regards
 
David Greig
______________________________
GigaDyne Ltd
Buchan House
Carnegie Campus
Dunfermline KY11 8PL
United Kingdom
t: +44 (0)1383 624 975
www.gigadyne.co.uk
______________________________

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
Sent: 10 November 2005 14:37
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Gold plated components, what a pain!!

Good Mornin' Everyone!

We've got a little problem here that I think everyone goes through, and maybe I can get some pointers on how to deal with it.

J-STD-001 states that:

3.9.3 Gold Removal

Gold shall be removed:

   From at least 95% of the surface to be soldered of the through-hole
   component leads with 2.5 ìm [0.0984 mil] or more of gold.

   From 95% of all surfaces of surface mount components to be soldered
   regardless of gold thickness.

   From the surface of solder terminals plated with 2.5 ìm [0.0984 mil] or
   more of gold.

A double tinning process or dynamic solder wave may be used for gold removal.

Electroless nickel immersion gold (ENIG) finishes on PCBs are exempt from this requirement.

These requirements may be eliminated if there is documented objective evidence available for review that there are no gold
related solder embrittlement problems associated with the soldering process being used.

I have no problem with the requirement, and I understand why the requirement is there, but the problem that we're having is that
these gold plated parts sometimes are discovered only when they've been pulled for a work order to be released for production,
or even worse, when they are being loaded on a feeder during machine set-up.

"Hey Steve, we got a gold plated part here!" So the set-up will be delayed, or the assembly will be built short and then the
gold plated part hand-soldered later after the gold has been removed depending on how urgent the schedule is.

We try to catch these gold plated parts in parts in receiving, if they can be identified there. But there are many parts are
coming in sealed, and we've discouraged sealed packaging from being opened until it is used.

Our manufacturing engineers say that they can't identify every single part that is gold plated without going through the
datasheet of every single part, or calling the component manufacturer, which there isn't enough hours in the day for them to do.

On top of the problem trying to identify the parts before they hit the SMT line, there is the difficulty of actually removing
the gold from some of these little beasts because of the size and geometry. For example, look at:

http://www.stevezeva.homestead.com/LEDFootPrint.jpg

How do you go about removing the gold on something like that? JANTX transistors are another one...

We've got a few customers that are giving indications that they might start banning 100% tin plated components unless they've
been tinned with standard tin/lead solder which will only intensify the problems that we're seeing now.

I'm just wondering how everyone else deals with this? I'm open for anything...any suggestions at all.

Kind regards,

-Steve Gregory-
Senior Process Engineer
LaBarge Incorporated
Tulsa, Oklahoma
(918) 459-2285
(918) 459-2350 FAX

__________________________________________________________________
This message may contain information that is privileged and confidential to LaBarge, Inc.  It is for use only by the individual
or entity named above.
If you are not the intended recipient, you may not copy, use or deliver this message to anyone.  In such event, you should
destroy the message and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
following text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send
e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC
web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at
[log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
--
Virus scanned by Lumison.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2