TECHNET Archives

October 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Croslin, Robert" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Croslin, Robert
Date:
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:06:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (94 lines)
Michael, do yourself and your CM's a favor and keep the revisions the
same. It's the only way to provide notification that something has
changed all the way down the chain.  If it has to be incorporated on
work in process, then you can opt to change the purchase order, forcing
the change to be recognized, or do it using a deviation order.  Talk to
your manufacturer on which method compliments their system best.  It
also gives your repair depot, if you have one, the same notification and
defines the requirement to implement on field returns if necessary.  We
have learned that lesson through 20+ years of having our metering
equipment built at CM's in the US, Europe, and now, China.  

The only exception we use is adding or deleting sources to a part.  To
do that we use a specific change notice that is distributed to all our
vendors, not just the one building the product.  Doing it this way is a
pain in the neck on the documentation end, but in the long run, it will
save you much grief as the revision advancing forces people to check and
see why.  

Bob Croslin
Nielsen Media Research

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael Kuczynski
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Assembly Documentation Question

The company I work for is going thru some documentation change
discussions.
Below are the documents that are revisable. (The parts list contains all
the IC's, cap, res. etc. and documents.) The feedback I'm getting is the
the parts list and the assembly drawing should ALWAYS be the same
revision (becasue thats the way its always been).
Everywhere I've every worked, these are independent documents.

Here are my scenerio case: (All documentation released at Rev. A)

Scenerio (Rev: B): A  part number change, of a 1K, 5%  resistor to a 1K,
1% resistor.
In this case, the part list and schematic would change, but it has no
effect on the assembly (because no part number or value is on the
assembly drawing).

PL1234567-1             Rev:    B       Parts List
        AW1234567       Rev:    A       Assy Dwg
        DS1234567       Rev:    A       Drill Dwg
        PC1234567       Rev:    A       Artwork
        PA1234567       Rev:    B       Schematic

Scenerio (Rev: C): The length of the screw holding the stiffener bar is
changed from 3/8 in. to 1/2 in.
The change is to the parts list only, the assembly drawing stays the
same.
(no 3D view or side view)

PL1234567-1             Rev:    C       Parts List
        AW1234567       Rev:    A       Assy Dwg
        DS1234567       Rev:    A       Drill Dwg
        PC1234567       Rev:    A       Artwork
        PA1234567       Rev:    B       Schematic


The current discussion and question is;
-Can the parts list be independently revisible, from the assembly
drawing?
-What do most of the assembly houses usually like?


Thanks for any response to this question.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask]

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2