TECHNET Archives

October 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:30:11 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Hi Clayton,
First, the biggest difference inpads should be—but rarely is, whether the 
soldering process is wave or reflow soldering. You need a large pad so the wave 
can touch it. for reflow soldering, the pad needs only to be the sam size as 
the component metallization—but rarely is because of old habits.
Second,   because of the drawbridging/tombstoning problem, the pads should be 
as small as possible—quite a contradiction. Trying to avoid this problem 
accounts, at least to some extent, for the various shapes.
I certainly would not use a large, one-size-fits-all pad option.



Werner

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2