Opens . Would they look elliptic-they could be only shifted, but connected.
An 8 shape means that the pad and the ball are not connected, maximum
sitting on one another.
Gaby
----- Original Message -----
From: "Franklin Asbell" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [TN] FW: bga image
> Interesting images, can almost make out voids (slight white spots?)
>
> It is strange that they 'all' seem to be oriented in the same direction,
> my
> first thought was distortion from the xray not centered (like the image
> was
> cut from a corner of the original image) but with studying I would say
> yeah,
> they are definitely distorted in a common direction. Could the component
> have shifted during assembly? Some form of pressure sliding the component
> in
> a direction making the ball form that way? Also see what looks like the
> ball
> actually off the pad? (appearance of filled in figure 8).
>
> Have these been tested yet? My money's on long list-o-opens...
>
> Franklin
>
> That paintball video...aaahhhh to be young and stupid again...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:45 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] FW: bga image
>
> Hi Everyone!
>
> DS sent me these images to post on my web page. Go to:
>
> http://www.stevezeva.homestead.com and click on "Picture Page 2" then
> look for: "X-ray 1 and X-ray2".
>
> To me, these images are very fuzzy, and hard to tell anything for sure.
> The
> spheres are definately not round like they should be, so that would be a
> big
> flag to me. As to what could be causing these images is hard to say
> because
> they are so fuzzy, but I wouldn't feel comfortable letting something go
> that looks
> like this without further investigation.
>
> Seeing how it's Friday, I got something on my page that's kinda' funny, if
> not
> really stupid...
>
> Yesterday during the baseball thread, Chris Ball writes:
>
> Based on that, I was gonna interject something about an anti-gravity ray
> being a weapon of mass destruction, but it wasn't making any sense at
> all. Then I realized.....
>
> The mass of an object is not dependent on gravity and therefore is
> different from but proportional to its weight.
>
> (sigh)
>
> Ask me a baseball question.
>
> Then Franklin Asbell interjects:
>
> "Interesting, so if I am sitting on a park bench and a 20' diameter
> sphere smacks me in the head at appr. 20 mph, would I receive the same
> headache if the same sphere hit me at 20 mph while I'm straddling the
> space station, in outer space?
>
> Then Richard Stadem responds:
>
> No, because if you were sitting on a park bench the 20' sphere would hit
> you in the head. However, if you were straddling the space station it
> would probably hit you somewhere else where it would hurt more;)
>
> and then Dewey Whitaker retorts:
>
> That's why they call them Asstronauts.
>
> So this video clip sums it all up. These guys are testing all the theories
> that have been
> outlined above, and then some...I wonder what conclusion they reached?
>
> Take a look at; "Paintball.wmv"
>
> These guys are the next Shuttle crew.....
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Steve Gregory-
> Senior Process Engineer
> LaBarge Incorporated
> Tulsa, Oklahoma
> (918) 459-2285
> (918) 459-2350 FAX
>
>
>
> |---------+---------------------------->
> | | "Bhandari, DS" |
> | | <DS.Bhandari@BARC|
> | | O.COM> |
> | | Sent by: TechNet |
> | | <[log in to unmask]>|
> | | |
> | | |
> | | 09/30/2005 02:09 |
> | | AM |
> | | Please respond to|
> | | TechNet E-Mail |
> | | Forum |
> | | <[log in to unmask]>|
> | | ; Please respond |
> | | to "Bhandari, DS"|
> | | <DS.Bhandari@BARC|
> | | O.COM> |
> | | |
> |---------+---------------------------->
>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------|
> |
> |
> | To: [log in to unmask]@SMTP@Exchange
> |
> | cc: (bcc: Stephen R Gregory/LABARGE)
> |
> | Subject: [TN] FW: bga image
> |
>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------------------------|
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> Can anybody tell me whether these x-ray images are acceptable. I found
> that
> few outer ball are partially cut but still 90% pad is covered with the
> solder . I could not find any reference in workmanship standard for this
> kind of problem. Kindly help.
>
> <<83.tif>> <<076.tif>>
> Best Regards
> DS Bhandari
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> This message may contain information that is privileged and confidential
> to
> LaBarge, Inc. It is for use only by the individual or entity named above.
> If you are not the intended recipient, you may not copy, use or deliver
> this message to anyone. In such event, you should destroy the message and
> kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
