Hi Everyone!
DS sent me these images to post on my web page. Go to:
http://www.stevezeva.homestead.com and click on "Picture Page 2" then
look for: "X-ray 1 and X-ray2".
To me, these images are very fuzzy, and hard to tell anything for sure. The
spheres are definately not round like they should be, so that would be a big
flag to me. As to what could be causing these images is hard to say because
they are so fuzzy, but I wouldn't feel comfortable letting something go that looks
like this without further investigation.
Seeing how it's Friday, I got something on my page that's kinda' funny, if not
really stupid...
Yesterday during the baseball thread, Chris Ball writes:
Based on that, I was gonna interject something about an anti-gravity ray
being a weapon of mass destruction, but it wasn't making any sense at
all. Then I realized.....
The mass of an object is not dependent on gravity and therefore is
different from but proportional to its weight.
(sigh)
Ask me a baseball question.
Then Franklin Asbell interjects:
"Interesting, so if I am sitting on a park bench and a 20' diameter
sphere smacks me in the head at appr. 20 mph, would I receive the same
headache if the same sphere hit me at 20 mph while I'm straddling the
space station, in outer space?
Then Richard Stadem responds:
No, because if you were sitting on a park bench the 20' sphere would hit
you in the head. However, if you were straddling the space station it
would probably hit you somewhere else where it would hurt more;)
and then Dewey Whitaker retorts:
That's why they call them Asstronauts.
So this video clip sums it all up. These guys are testing all the theories that have been
outlined above, and then some...I wonder what conclusion they reached?
Take a look at; "Paintball.wmv"
These guys are the next Shuttle crew.....
Kind regards,
-Steve Gregory-
Senior Process Engineer
LaBarge Incorporated
Tulsa, Oklahoma
(918) 459-2285
(918) 459-2350 FAX
"Bhandari, DS" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
09/30/2005 02:09 AM
Please respond to TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to "Bhandari, DS" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]@SMTP@Exchange
cc: (bcc: Stephen R Gregory/LABARGE)
Subject: [TN] FW: bga image
Dear All,
Can anybody tell me whether these x-ray images are acceptable. I found that
few outer ball are partially cut but still 90% pad is covered with the
solder . I could not find any reference in workmanship standard for this
kind of problem. Kindly help.
<<83.tif>> <<076.tif>>
Best Regards
DS Bhandari
__________________________________________________________________
This message may contain information that is privileged and confidential to LaBarge, Inc. It is for use only by the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not copy, use or deliver this message to anyone. In such event, you should destroy the message and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail.
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
