TECHNET Archives

September 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dehoyos, Ramon" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Dehoyos, Ramon
Date:
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:08:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (288 lines)
                I would not be surprised if the X ray does damage some
components depending on the intensity and the duration of the exposure.
Part of the process in building a chip or IC is ion implantation. A
material is doped positive or negative with respective ions, i.e. Ion
implanter. Layer thickness is getting smaller every year, in the
Angstroms, (1 micrometer = 10000 Angstroms = 0.001 millimeters =
0.0000394 inches ). The length of a transistor gate is 60 nanometers. I
have also heard not to take some sensitive electronic equipment through
X ray at the air ports due to the intensity of the exposure since
several years ago from people that work with me and take electronic
equipment all the time.
Does anyone know someone that can do that type of experimentation or
know someone that already have?
        Ramon
 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Charles Caswell
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:39 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] X-ray inspection, can it damage devices?

Steve, I have heard of X-Ray erasing some memory but not actually
damaging the component. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen R Gregory [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 September 2005 1:43 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] X-ray inspection, can it damage devices?

                                Hi Phil!

                                The BGA in question is a small one, only
100-balls, and a plastic part with no heat-sink.
                                It's on the bottomside of the board, and
has to go through reflow one more time when the
                                topside is built.

                                As I said, everything looks fine at
x-ray...it is inspected pretty closely too.

                                Our customer is the one who is worried
about x-ray, not us. They can't get the device to
                                accept a program on some boards, and
they are thinking that possibly x-ray damaged
                                the device.

                                Kind regards,

                                -Steve Gregory-
                                Senior Process Engineer
                                LaBarge Incorporated
                                Tulsa, Oklahoma
                                (918) 459-2285
                                (918) 459-2350 FAX





        Phillip Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>
                        Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
                        09/27/2005 01:16 PM
                        Please respond to TechNet E-Mail Forum
<[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to Phillip Bavaro
<[log in to unmask]>
                                	
        To:     [log in to unmask]@SMTP@Exchange
        cc:     (bcc: Stephen R Gregory/LABARGE)
        Subject:        Re: [TN] X-ray inspection, can it damage
devices?



                                Hi Steve,

                                I haven't ever heard of or experienced
any
issues with an xray inspection system causing damage to a chip.    It is
hard
to believe that xrays momentarily exposed to a chip could cause damage.

                                I have seen some Altera BGAs that have
difficulty getting good solder joint reflow due to the heatsinks on top
of them, the pwb's 24 layers, and the sheer number of solderballs
(1500+).  With your .050" copper core, I would look at the thermal
reflow and make sure that all the balls on the BGAs have fully
collapsed.

                                Was this BGA on the second side or first
side reflowed?

                                It is tough sometimes to tell where the
problem is if you don't have a board level test in place.

                                Phil


                                Steve Gregory
<[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
                                Good Mornin' Everyone!

                                I hope you all had a good weekend! I
worked Saturday, but had
                                Sunday off. Sat around Sunday and
watched the NASCAR race
                                at the "Monster Mile" in Dover Delaware.
20-year old Kyle Busch
                                gave Jimmie Johnson a run for his money
finishing second at the
                                green/white/checkered ending....but I
digress.....

                                Anyways, we built an assembly here that
has a .050" copper core
                                in the center of it...not the same
assembly as the one I did my "okie
                                cross-section" on).

                                It is double-sided SMT, and has BGA's on
both sides. I'm doing x-ray
                                inspection with a Fein Focus Tiger 160,
and in order to penetrate the
                                core and do a proper inspection of the
solder joints and spheres of the
                                BGA's, the x-ray power is up around
120-130kv.

                                Our customer received a number of the
assemblies from us (without test
                                from us, as they are prototypes and test
hasn't been developed yet), and
                                they are having problems with one of the
BGA's.

                                It's a 100-ball Max-7000 device from
Altera, a CMOS EEPROM, and our
                                customer has been trying to program the
device via on-board programming,
                                but some boards wont program. The x-ray
inspection turned out fine. All
                                BGA's were inspected using oblique
angles, so if there was an open joint,
                                it would have been seen.

                                They are worried that maybe the x-rays
may have damaged the device.
                                Altera has told our customer that the
x-rays shouldn't hurt the device.
                                I've got
                                a case number started via email in to
Altera (since I can't talk to anyone
                                on
                                the phone), asking them myself if x-rays
will damage the device. I'm also
                                going to call Fein Focus and talk to
them as well.

                                But have any of you ever heard of x-ray
damaging BGA's?

                                Kind regards,

                                -Steve Gregory-
                                Senior Process Engineer
                                LaBarge Incorporated
                                Tulsa, Oklahoma
                                (918) 459-2285
                                (918) 459-2350 FAX
 
__________________________________________________________________
                                This message may contain information
that is privileged and confidential to
                                LaBarge, Inc. It is for use only by the
individual or entity named above.
                                If you are not the intended recipient,
you may not copy, use or deliver
                                this message to anyone. In such event,
you should destroy the message and
                                kindly notify the sender by reply
e-mail.

 
---------------------------------------------------
                                Technet Mail List provided as a service
by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
                                To unsubscribe, send a message to
[log in to unmask] with following text in
                                the BODY (NOT the subject field):
SIGNOFF Technet
                                To temporarily halt or (re-start)
delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
or (MAIL)
                                To receive ONE mailing per day of all
the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
                                Search the archives of previous posts
at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
                                Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
 
-----------------------------------------------------

 
__________________________________________________
                                Do You Yahoo!?
                                Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best
spam protection around

 
---------------------------------------------------
                                Technet Mail List provided as a service
by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
                                To unsubscribe, send a message to
[log in to unmask] with following text in
                                the BODY (NOT the subject field):
SIGNOFF Technet
                                To temporarily halt or (re-start)
delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
or (MAIL)
                                To receive ONE mailing per day of all
the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
                                Search the archives of previous posts
at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
                                Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
 
-----------------------------------------------------
                                http://mail.yahoo.com



 
__________________________________________________________________
                                This message may contain information
that is privileged and confidential to LaBarge, Inc.  It is for use only
by the individual or entity named above.  If you are not the intended
recipient, you may not copy, use or deliver this message to anyone.  In
such event, you should destroy the message and kindly notify the sender
by reply e-mail.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2