TECHNET Archives

September 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:18:34 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
This is an example of a severe malady that has hit our industry and the 
general public of recent years: a lack of commonsense to the extent of 
stupidity. Commonsense would dictate that the chain length should be 
sufficient to ensure dissipation of any potential charge (which can be 
verified with an instrument). Stupidity would dictate that the length 
must be standardised, whether it is sufficient to dissipate the charge 
or not.

For Goodness's sake, when are we going to wake up to the fact that a 
surfeit of standards is a very costly alternative to practical 
commonsense? If the final product does the job for which it is designed 
for the length of time for which it is intended, then it is good enough, 
whether or not it conforms to a thousand standards, causing it to be 
thus grossly and expensively over-specified.

There is a corollary to this: it is bad engineering to over specify. If 
an engineer says that if one unit in a standard is good, then two units 
must be better, he should be given his pink slip on the spot. Why? 
Because he is not applying scientific principles to his job. As a stupid 
contextual example, let's imagine that Standard XYZ1234-5A states that a 
trailing chain on a trolley should have 10 cm in contact with the ESD 
flooring, then 100 cm must be 10 times better, even if it means that the 
guy pushing the trolley trips up over the chain (in links 22.3 mm ±0.5 
mm long and 14.1 mm ±0.2 mm wide, in 25 µm ± 2 µm copper-plated Swedish 
Armco iron, diameter 4 mm ±0.1 mm, with each link electrically welded 
and X-rayed for weld integrity) and breaks his front teeth on the handle.

Oh! How many times in my 51 years in the electronics industry have I 
seen bad engineering because some inept engineer has followed a standard 
or a specification that is not relevant to the work he is doing? 
Thousands! And each time this happens, he is wasting his employer's 
hard-earned cash. I am not saying that specs are bad: they are necessary 
in some cases (a few?). But one ounce of common sense is frequently much 
better than a tonne of documents specifying how an avionics device 
should be built, when you are making I-Pods.

Can the IPC make an ANSI Standard stating that commonsense rules over 
all other specs that are not absolutely relevant to the job in hand?

Brian

Joseph Sokalski wrote:
> Dear Technetters:
> 
> Has anyone seen a documented standard for the recommended drag chain length
> attached to rolling carts? During a recent customer audit, I was cited for
> insufficient chain contact with our ESD flooring. I looked in ANSI/ESD
> S20.20-1999 and did not see any reference.
> 
> Any assistance would be appreciated.
> 
> Joseph Sokalski
> Test Technology, Inc
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 

-- 
______________________________________________
Please note new e-mail address [log in to unmask]

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2