Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | (Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum) |
Date: | Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:23:29 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Have you 100% self test for every other operation or claim that vendors
make for their products on existing D of C's - I doubt it. So why get
paranoid now? Accepting D of C's is permissible but ought if practicable
be backed up by spot testing.
Getting details of the composition is not a requirement of RoHS and
would add significant burden to do so. Why push for more than is
required - if too many people push then it will become a defacto
requirement and then a mandatory requirement.
Do you take your car home after a smog check and then take it to a lab
to have it checked again or do you accept the smog station certificate?
Regards,
Chris
____________
_____
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of jeff
collins
Sent: 08 September 2005 09:55
To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
Subject: RoHS: Proof of Supplier Component Compliance
Group,
I am finding several component suppliers ( many who are major mfr's )
that will issue a COC or letter of conformity to RoHS but with no
Evidence of compliance or even a breakdown of the weights or percentages
of the hazardous substances.
Is anyone else having this issue? This puts us in a position where we
either have to:
* Blindly accept their COC/Letter of conformance and HOPE they really
are compliant and do not exceed the hazardous threshold limits.
* Have their components tested. ( An expensive option )
* Change suppliers to one that can provide this info ( A very very
painful and expensive option at this point )
So I know this is a rhetorical question but how can they claim
compliance for their components and not know the Mass and % of Content
of the banned substances?
Thanks,
Jeff Collins
---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [log in to unmask]
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas [log in to unmask] Mike Cantwell [log in to unmask]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [log in to unmask] Jim Bacher: [log in to unmask]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
-----------------------------------------
This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are
not the intended recipient, delete this message. If you are not the
intended recipient, disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking an
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
y
action based on this message is strictly prohibited.
|
|
|