LEADFREE Archives

September 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Davy, Gordon" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:29:51 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
The responses to Ken Patel's inquiry about compliance of intentionally
added lead have all offered answers. I know that I have seen discussions
as to why including the provision for intentional addition in a document
is a bad idea, namely that it is practically unenforceable. Test methods
are being developed to determine concentration, but how does an
inspector determine intent? So I agree with Bev.

However, my real reason for posting is not to offer another answer but
just to satisfy my curiosity: For what purpose is lead intentionally
being added at such a low level, and what is it being added to? 

 

Gordon Davy 

Baltimore, MD 

[log in to unmask]

410-993-7399 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2