TECHNET Archives

August 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"TUGMEN UNSAL (MIKES INTERNET)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, TUGMEN UNSAL (MIKES INTERNET)
Date:
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:34:43 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Hello all,

Could you please assist me to find answer of the questions listed
below.?

1. Why the use of H type flux in the solder paste is not prefered for
Class III equipment production?

2. Any negative impact recorded at IPC since the use of solder paste
with H type flux and so that corrective action taken?

3. What kind of solder paste is acceptable for DoD requirements and
other Class III equipment production?

4. What type of water soluable solder paste prefferable for Class III
applications?

4. Do IPC suggest any specific method to measure the thickness of the
solder paste on the PWB before beginning the process?

 

Regards,

 

Tugmen UNS@L

[log in to unmask]

 

 


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2