If it was an algorithm of digitization would it be alright for use on
cutting edge technology stuff?
Thanks for the formula. As you can unfortunately realize, I believe my
E-Mail filter has been removed so you will no longer go unpunished.
Dewey
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ryan Grant
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 10:25 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] max thickness electroplated gold
Hi Guy,
Its not a rule of thumb, its science... Gold embrittlement happens at
4% gold per volume of tin for eutectic Tin/Lead solder. Clearly this
rule isn't a sharp "edge" so I'd recommend a safety margin.
Now lets do the math...
Assume the component pad size is a 1:1 ratio to printed pad size.
Volume of the gold (V_g) = l*w*h_g (length times width times gold
thickness)
Volume of the solder (V_s) = l*w*h_s*.5*t_r
where .5=close approximation of solder powder volume to printed
paste volume and
where t_r= tin ratio of the alloy.
Since we are looking for the ratio where V_g/V_s = 4% as the drop dead
ratio, and Since we assume component pad size is 1:1 to printed pad
size, l*w cancels out.
We now have h_g/(h_s*.5*t_r) = 4%
Solve for h_g = .04*h_s*.5*t_r
If we assume a 5 mil stencil
h_g = t_r*.0001
Assuming Tin/Lead solder at 63/37
h_g = 0.000063 = 63uin
That 63uin includes both component and PCB pad gold thickness.
That said, your 50 to 100 micro inches is bad news...
By the way, if the component is BGA, it comes loaded with a lot more
solder, thus the calculation will need to include the volume of the BGA
ball.
If you are using Lead-Free solder, this rule doesn't apply and
transferring principles becomes complicated. The 4% rule is known to
apply to silver as well, but you will notice Lead-free alloys are
already at a 4% ratio of silver to tin but do not exhibit the same
embrittlement failure implied with Tin/Lead embrittlement. The specific
point that gold, or silver, embrittles a Lead-Free solder joint has not
been studied and published, as far as I know. (If anyone knows
otherwise, please let me know the reference).
Good luck,
Ryan Grant
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Guy Ramsey
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 2:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] max thickness electroplated gold
Many of our customers are using the old MIL-STD-275 to specify gold
thickness for Hard Gold. They are ordering this because they are doing
both wafer and package testing at the die and device level. So, we are
seeing 50 to 100 uin of gold over nickel. It hasn't been much of an
issue because we build most of the boards by hand soldering methods.
We are starting to see components in the parts list for these assemblies
that cannot be installed with hand soldering methods.
When we solder with printed paste and reflow methods we see dull, grainy
joint that are clearly contaminated with gold.
When we hand solder this condition is not evident. (I believe the
condition may actually be worse because the dissolved gold is more
concentrated near the bottom of the fillet. But, that is another
discussion).
Does any one have a rule of thumb for the maximum thickness of
electroplated gold on land patterns intended to receive SMT components .
. . say, 0402 passives or MLFs?
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing
per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
