LEADFREE Archives

August 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Suraski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 17:24:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (114 lines)
I can't comment on whether or not NASA or the Airforce has ever
encountered problems with Sn/Ag alloys.  I'm not saying that every board
built with Sn/Ag will fail.   Joint strength is dependent upon several
factors.  I guess the bottom line is, failures appear to be more
likely/common with this alloy versus SAC alloys, which is one reason why
the industry has embraced SAC alloys more so than Sn/Ag alloys.

Dave 

-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Smith, Rick
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 5:17 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] 96.5% Tin / 3.5% Silver vs. SAC305

Why hasn't NASA or the Airforce ever complained about this? 

Seems to me they have specified use of the Sn96 and Sn96.5 alloy on many
programs for many years??   

Rick Smith
Senior Product/ Component Engineer
 
Phone: (512)652-3544
Fax:     (512)652-3545
Cell:     (512)299-6925
Email:   [log in to unmask]
 
ClearCube Technology, Inc
8834 Capital of Texas Hwy N
Austin, TX 78759
 
www.clearcube.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Suraski
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 1:50 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] 96.5% Tin / 3.5% Silver vs. SAC305

... and don't forget the silver phase change problems and poorer
mechanical fatigue resistance as compared to Sn/Ag/Cu.

Regards,
David Suraski
AIM 

-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of MA/NY DDave
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 2:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] 96.5% Tin / 3.5% Silver vs. SAC305

Hi KEDS-Rich, John, SPVC, IPC LF Listservers

Stopping for a minute on this fun discussion/learning experience.

If you decide to use 96.5Sn you do know that your soldering temperature
will be higher and you might have component MSL problems. I know it is
only a few degrees yet you don't have lots of margin on some of your
products.


YiEngr, MA/NY DDave

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree To
temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send:
SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL) Search previous postings at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree To
temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks
send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree To
temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send:
SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL) Search previous postings at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2