LEADFREE Archives

August 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Burtt, Nigel" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:29:55 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
 

The report is useful and good news for the industry as a whole in that

it says that there is no practical difference in SMT assembly between

SAC305 which seems to be gaining the favourite spot in Japan and US due

mainly to lower Ag content, and the SAC387 which appears to be possibly

more favoured in UK and Europe due perhaps to original selection of the

IDEALS project. Its clear however with issues over various Pb-free

solder patents etc that the solder companies do have a vested interest

in having the industry use mostly one standard alloy and would obviously

prefer their customer to choose the one which suits their business

better.



I'm intrigued that this thread says that the NEMI report into Pb-F wave

soldering is not testing the SAC387 alloy only the SAC305 against the

patented SnCu+X variants. Does anyone know why this is? We decided to go

with SAC for all our processes and chose SAC387 for wave and selective

because it is somewhat closer to the SAC eutectic than SAC305, going

with the same selection basis that we use SnPb 63/37 instead of the

cheaper 60/40, and that the plastic range would be less affected by

copper pick-up than SAC305.



-----------------------------------------

This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential

information intended for a specific individual and purpose.  If you are

not the intended recipient, delete this message.  If you are not the

intended recipient, disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any

action based on this message is strictly prohibited.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2