IPC-600-6012 Archives

August 2005

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Request for Plating Definitions for IPC-T-50
From:
Chris Mahanna <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)
Date:
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:25:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
Werner, I agree.  But according to 6012 "enclosed folds" are o.k.
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Werner
Engelmaier
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 1:41 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [IPC-600-6012] Request for Plating Definitions for IPC-T-50


Ahhh, Chris, but they are not o.k. The 'healed' folds are stress risers at
best, and will result in   PTV barrel fractures either during manufacturing or
afterwards if there are thermal cyclic operationg conditions.



Werner

ATOM RSS1 RSS2