TECHNET Archives

June 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)
Date:
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:18:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Our age-old practice has been to put stoppers or pins in partially
filled 
tubes of DIP's to keep parts from sliding.  Ostensible reason was to
prevent tribocharging from parts sliding back and forth.

Now I'm wondering about the basis for this.  I can't find anything in 
ESD S20.20 or the handbook, likewise MIL-STD-1686C or MIL-HDBK-263.

Where does this practice come from, and does it still make sense?  JEDEC
maybe?  I haven't tried, but I expect it's kind of difficult to measure
the charge on 
such small parts, especially inside a static shielding tube.

FYI, we still use a lot of ceramic DIP's, along with some plastic, and
small
lots of surface mount parts may also come in this way.

Joe Kane
BAE SYSTEMS
Johnson City, NY

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2