TECHNET Archives

June 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Alcorn, Brent" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Alcorn, Brent
Date:
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:22:40 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (192 lines)
Good point.




-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ed Popielarski
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 2:20 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Lemmings to the sea

Hi all,



I've been pretty quiet on this subject and now I think it's time to have
my soapbox session. Most likely I'm going to ruffle a few feathers.



Has anyone noticed the "who, where and why" of this whole thing? It is
(IMHO) all a financial enhancement to the tin industry, researched (The
Tin Institute), controlled (The London Metal Exchange or "LME") and
benefiting the tin producing countries (also owned/operated by ???).



Political science is the furthest from my expertise, but it seems to me
by making Pb the "bad guy" and eliminating 37% of it from the
electronics industry, it's going to increase the consumption of Sn by
approximately 50%.
Without increasing the source of Sn (mines) and increasing the demand
(us) they (LME) raise the price. Money goes into someone's pocket, no?
But it's even more clever (or is it cleverer?) than that. keep the
spotlight on the lead, not the tin. PB free! Yippee!



 I'd like you to consider as well the source of the Pb. I believe we
took it from the ground in the first place, no? Don't get me wrong, I
like trees as much as the next guy and ODC's are a manmade evil, but Pb?
It was on this planet long before humans were. Perhaps this answers the
earlier post about batteries and why no one is attacking that (80% ish)
significant consumer.
It's not really about the environment, nor H&S. it's about money.
Perhaps Brian's dissertation below has identified a way out of this
nightmare if we all pull together. Comments?



(Someone please hand me my flack jacket now.)







Regards,



Ed Popielarski

QTA Machine

27291 Jardines

Mission Viejo, Ca 92692



Ph: 949-581-6601



WWW.QTA.NET



You see, wire <http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/26870.html>
telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New
York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? And
radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they receive
them there. The only difference is that there is no cat.



Albert Einstein <http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Albert_Einstein/>
(1879 - 1955), when asked to describe radio



------------------------------



Date:    Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:30:52 +0300

From:    Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: Lead-Free, Why?



By coincidence, I wrote an Internet Commentary for Soldering and Surface

Mount Technology Vol 17 No. 4 last week. This will be published on 30

September 2005, according to the schedule. This literally slams into the

  implementation of the RoHS and WEEE Directives, using Mr Bumble's

quote as the sub-title: "If the law supposes that ... the law is a ass -

a idiot". Unfortunately, copyright and pre-publication non-disclosure

forbid me from reproducing it here, but you may be interested to read it

when that issue of SSMT slams into your in-tray with a resounding thump.

Pity the deadline to publication interval is 3 months!



That having been said, my opposition to the RoHS Directive is based

mainly on environmental grounds. Now, as I understand it, European law

states that any Directive that has an impact on the environment or H&S

must have a risk assessment conducted. This never happened with RoHS or

WEEE because "funding was not available". I therefore contend that there

is a possibility that these Directives may be null and void. It would

require a lot of legal eagles to study whether my contention is valid,

followed by a case before the European Court of Justice to have a

judgement whether the European Commission committed an illegal act by

not having a Risk Assessment, which would overturn the Directives.

Obviously this would be a costly action, a wee bit more than my

retirement pension affords me, but somebody here (or the IPC European

Representative) may wish to make a preliminary enquiry into the

potential validity of my contention. If he thinks he has a case and

applies to the ECJ for a judgement, he may be able to obtain an

immediate suspended injunction ("effet suspensif") delaying the entry

into force of the Directives until after the scheduled judgement. A bon

entendeur, salut!



Brian

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

****************************************************************
The information transmitted in this message is confidential and may be privileged.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Analogic Corporation immediately - by replying to this message or by sending an email to [log in to unmask] - and destroy all copies of this information, including any attachments, without reading or disclosing them.

Thank you.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2