LEADFREE Archives

June 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Barnes <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:37:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Liz,
You are right.  California's Proposition 65 doesn't totally ban the use
of the listed chemicals.  It requires a warning label if a person's
total exposure to any listed chemical exceeds 0.1% of the amount that
could have an "observable effect".  But to many of my clients, scaring
off customers with a prominent tag on each product saying "TAKE THESE
PRECAUTIONS AFTER HANDLING THIS UNIT" is effectively the same as banning
the listed chemicals.

The Toxics Use Reduction Institute (TURI) has a very informative paper
"Coated Wire and Cable Industry: Lead Alternatives and Testing for
Restricted Substances" at
   http://www.turi.org/content/content/view/full/2082/

                John Barnes KS4GL, PE, NCE, ESDC Eng, PSE, SM IEEE
                dBi Corporation
                http://www.dbicorporation.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2