Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | (Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum) |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:38:04 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Technos,
I start being confused by the thread started by Ingemar, so I would like to widen the topic a bit.
1. The ceramic caps will be more prone to internal cracks when on lead-free. To prevent that it is necessary to eliminate the fillets and make the joints thicker. I've been through major fighting here to get the designers stick to IPC-7531, now I have to make them change the CCs... Well, that's my problem. On the other hand, besides overprinting, are there any other solutions to increase the height of the solder joint (I assume applications where stencils thicker than 6 mils are not an option)
2. Recently Ingemar made a statement on the tantalum caps, that they should be a stay-away. Why?
3. What about embedded passives in lead-free? Any data, Happy Holden?
Thanks,
Ioan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|