TECHNET Archives

May 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard
Date:
Thu, 26 May 2005 12:35:45 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
I agree. The term should be done away with. Nowadays, solder will "coat
over" many substances, but that is not soldering. 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Werner Engelmaier
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 12:03 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Wetting balance

Speaking of that, Werner, do you remember me? I was the program engineer
at Honeywell for the A-12 Flight control system in St. Louis Park, MN.
You came in in 1986 to help me find out why we had excellent wetting
characteristics of IC leads on a Cu-In-Cu assembly, but the solder
joints were fracturing. The problem was that we were soldering to gold
over nickel, and the nickel was heavily oxidized under the gold. This
was a classic case of solder appearing to wet over the pad properly, but
a good IMF never really formed, thus causing the "well-wetted" solder
joints to fracture in the saddle during thermal cycling.
Hi Richard,
Good to hear from you.
Sure do--and have had a problem with the unfortunate choice of the word
"wetting" ever since. For solder joints, 'wetting' does not mean
'wetting' in the hand-washing sense, but includes the dissolution of the
base metal into the Sn of the solder, the formation of intermetallic
layer(s), and the formation of a sound metallurgical bond. The choice of
the word "wetting" for this process has led to a lot of problems over
the years.
Werner Engelmaier

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the
posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the
archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2