TECHNET Archives

May 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Douglas O. Pauls" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 25 May 2005 07:10:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (86 lines)
Luigi,
Not to eat into Graham's MUST sales, you might also consider sequential
electrochemical reduction analysis (SERA) as an alternative.  It is
non-destructive in nature so you don't waste components in the analysis.
ECI Technology sells SERA equipment
(http://www.ecitechnology.com/index2.cfm?contentID=79).  Dave Hillman is
the expert in this technology, but is on travel this week.  We use this
technology here to evaluate solderability of components and boards stored
for long periods of time prior to production.

Doug Pauls




             Luigi Cantagallo
             <Luigi.CANTAGALLO
             @ETCA.ALCATEL.BE>                                          To
             Sent by: TechNet          [log in to unmask]
             <[log in to unmask]>                                          cc

                                                                   Subject
             05/25/2005 04:00          [TN] Wetting balance
             AM


             Please respond to
              TechNet E-Mail
                   Forum
             <[log in to unmask]>
             ; Please respond
                    to
             Luigi.CANTAGALLO@
              ETCA.ALCATEL.BE






Hello Technetters,

I have questions about wetting balance.
We intend to use a wetting balance not to accept/reject supplied SMD's (Our
SMD's are 1 to 5 years old) but to minimize the risk of solderability
defects in production (Low volume, SnPb technology).
So we don't apply J-STD-002D criterium but we try to find them to
corroborate wetting balance and production results.
On some tests (Wetting balance calibrated and in order, same type of flux,
same alloy) on same component lots, we have not a perfect correspondence
between wetting balance and visual inspections results in production (Vapor
phase soldering). One of the case is "Good at the solderability test/Defect
in production" and this one is the most risky.
Somebody have experience with that kind of problem?
What actions have you made ?

Thanks for answers.

Best regards,

CANTAGALLO Luigi

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2