TECHNET Archives

May 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Blair K. Hogg" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Blair K. Hogg
Date:
Thu, 19 May 2005 05:13:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
Our products are approved by UL, FM, CSA, MSHA, etc. With every change, I have to resubmit to these agencies at a few thousand dollars each to maintain the approvals.

Blair

>>> [log in to unmask] 05/18/05 07:58PM >>>
curious .. why does it cost "tens of thousands of dollars" to "roll the
revision" , In Asia it costs about $ 1.00. Could that be the reason why most
of the high volume business moved to Asia ?

Wolfgang



----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Grant" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [TN] SMOBC question...


> That "roll the revision" complaint is valid for the designer.  Even in
> the non-Military realm, it cost tens of thousands of dollars to get
> product #XXX-revision X qualified with customer A, and they only do
> qualifications within certain windows of opportunity.  Changing a
> revision of a drawing often means requalifying, and if the window is
> closed, loss of sales because the product is no longer qualified, which
> could mean losses of millions of dollars...  Whew!  Who'd of thought
> that just changing a little thing would cost so much.  It's pretty
> frustrating and makes a guy want to just slap someone!
>
> Ryan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stephen Gregory
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:13 AM
> To: [log in to unmask] 
> Subject: Re: [TN] SMOBC question...
>
> Jack,
>
> I wish there were designers like you at the customers
> we deal with...and sometimes (to make the communication
> problem even worse), a design is not our customers design,
> but something they have outsourced.
>
> But even if you do get to communicate with the actual designer,
> and then find out that a note on the drawing is pretty meaningless,
> and makes the fab that much harder to build, many times I have
> heard; "Well, if we remove the note from the drawing, that'll mean
> we'll have to roll the revision on the drawing, and that's just too much
> trouble..."
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Steve Gregory-
> Senior Process Engineer
> LaBarge Incorporated
> Tulsa, Oklahoma
> (918) 459-2285
> (918) 459-2350 FAX
>
>

*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.

www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2