TECHNET Archives

May 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Scott B. Westheimer" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Scott B. Westheimer
Date:
Wed, 11 May 2005 10:20:36 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (99 lines)
ENIG process is hard on SM due to the temperatures that most of the
electroless nickels run at and if the SM coating is not thickness enough it
will break down. Applying the ENIG first over the complete board surface of
course will eliminate this possible problem and should not be a cost driver
unless there is large ground areas. I am not sure actually what the peel
strength of SM is over ENIG compared to Cu but I do remember reading some
time ago that they are lower. What ever lower means. Also if it is a
controlled impedance job the ENIG finish may effect the results if no
calculated correctly.

Scott Westheimer
Colonial Circuits
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Gregory" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 9:32 AM
Subject: [TN] LPI adhesion on ENIG vs. copper...


> Mornin' all you 'Netters!
>
> Gotta question. We're getting a board quoted to buy, and the shop has
> come back for some relief on some notes on the drawing that state:
>
> Process Notes:
>
> 1. Plate all exposed areas with Electroless Immersion Gold
> Nickel 100 microinches thk., Gold 2-10 microinches thk. min.
>
> 2. Apply LPI soldermask over bare copper (SMOBC)
> Color: Green
> Conform to IPC-SM-840, Class H Current rev.
> Resizing of soldermask pad clearances may be
> required due to suppliers choice of material and/or
> process. soldermask clearance for vias to be .004 larger than drill hole.
>
> The fab house is asking to plate the whole board with ENIG, and then apply
> the soldermask because they say that the ENIG process after applying the
> LPI
> will make the mask look ugly.
>
> I know the ENIG process can be tough on soldermasks, but I thought that
> problem
> has already been worked out...
>
> I gues my real question is; is the adhesion of LPI over ENIG any worse or
> better than
> SMOBC?
>
> My gut feel is to tell the fab house to comply with the notes on the
> drawing, I really
> don't want to ask our customer if the fab house can deviate from the notes
> on the
> drawing. But on the other hand, I don't want to get a raggedy looking
> board
> from
> them if they don't have their ENIG processes in control...
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Steve Gregory-
> Senior Process Engineer
> LaBarge Incorporated
> Tulsa, Oklahoma
> (918) 459-2285
> (918) 459-2350 FAX
> __________________________________________________________________
> This message may contain information that is privileged and confidential
> to
> LaBarge, Inc.  It is for use only by the individual or entity named above.
> If you are not the intended recipient, you may not copy, use or deliver
> this message to anyone.  In such event, you should destroy the message and
> kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2