DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

May 2005

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Alcorn, Brent" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Thu, 12 May 2005 11:00:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (78 lines)
STATEMENT:
In no way am I trying to belittle the MAJOR efforts that went into the
program or the standard.

That isn't what is being questioned  (Again).

- Brent

Last Response:

Chris you said:
<SNIP>
I'm not sure why some took my comments to mean that I resist change or
resent better tools and those who make them, but I must have had it
coming, and am sorry for having implied it.
<SNIP>

Chris, I didn't read that into your original post at all.  My
understanding is you are only questioning the rational to why IPC is
bundling a vendor's product with a standard ..... Good question.



Joe you said:
<SNIP>
That's common sense and the fact that we're having a discussion like
this challenges my faith in natural selection. IPC Is not a government
agency.  Even the flippin' IRS will tell you can get Tax software...Does
that challenge my relationship with them?  Of course not (that's an
issue unto itself).  No where does IPC say you need to use this, or even
still go as far as to reccomend using it.  The issue here is the
*implied* reccomendation which to me is absurd.
IPC Is not a government agency. 

<SNIP>

Have another cup of coffee man.... Sheeze..

You may want to re-read my post... I NEVER said IPC was a government
agency ....    I said "governing"...


The word I chose to used was to show how IMPORTANT IPC is to this
industry, or in my eyes anyway. That is why this troubles me and
obviously others.


Would you like toast with your coffee or would you like coffee on your
toast.... you get both, but, there is a difference.


Regards,
Brent


My opinion only, again, this isn't Analogic's.












****************************************************************
The information transmitted in this message is confidential and may be privileged.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Analogic Corporation immediately - by replying to this message or by sending an email to [log in to unmask] - and destroy all copies of this information, including any attachments, without reading or disclosing them.

Thank you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2