TECHNET Archives

April 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Mcmaster, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Mcmaster, Michael
Date:
Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:04:23 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
I occasionally see OL copper thickness specs where the finished thickness is
called out in ounces of copper.  For instance, 0.5 oz foil plated up to 2.0
oz.  I'm not sure how to interpret this.

The nominal thickness for 2.0 oz of copper comes out to be something like
2.75 mils (70 microns).  But the 2 oz copper I use to build the boards
doesn't come to me that thick and only needs to be 2.2 mils or 56 um by the
time I'm done with it.

Surely, I'm not the only one to see this.  How are others treating this?  Do
you try to plate to 70 ums but accept 56 um as the minimum?  Or is 70 um the
minimum?

Is there any industry standard anywhere that covers copper plating thickness
in this method?



Follow the copper foil road.....

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2