TECHNET Archives

March 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:35:42 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (127 lines)
... provided that the components support the ultrasonic energy and
frequency levels. If any part of a component enters into mechanical
resonance at any part of the frequency spectrum used to generate the
cavitation, then there is a real risk of mechanical damage. This can
notably occur when:
- there are unsupported gold or aluminium electrical bonding wires
between a semiconductor chip and its external connection. It will not
happen when the bonding wires are supported by plastic moulding or
"glob-tops". Metal- or ceramic-cased components are most at risk. The
main problem is not necessarily immediate component failure but
weakening of the bond which may fail later.
- a connection to an otherwise unsupported piezo-electric crystal
consists of a thin wire connected to the metallisation by a conductive
adhesive; there is a tendency for the resonance to cause the
metallisation to be torn away.
- a large multilayer ceramic capacitor has a height equal to a
quarter-wavelength or multiple thereof of the sound waves travelling
through the ceramic; this may set up a resonance sufficient to cause
cleavage of the capacitor. This is particularly insidious, because the
two fragments are often held together by the solder joint and the
assembly continues to function - until the top falls off, maybe months
later.

I have personally experienced examples of all three of these cases, so I
know that they can and do occur.

Brian

Joyce Koo wrote:
> "If a proper
> intensity, frequency and time is taken, there is no risk
> of mechanical damage."
>                       jk
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Dehoyos, Ramon
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 1:12 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Ultrasonic
> 
> 
>      Is ultrasonic cleaning  coming back? found this article in
> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/8909/28167/01260581.pdf?arnumber=1260581
> 
>         Ramon
> 
>     3.1 UItrasonic energy
> Micro-vibrations in the liquid cause cavities
> (vacuum "bubbles") by which contracting a very
> intensive scrubbing effect is generated. The more
> energy density, the higher effect is produced, but
> because of it's cavitation character, it can also damage
> the basis material. This is why many of assemblists do
> not like to use ultrasonic energy at all. Statistics show,
> that millions PCB's /year are cleaned with help of
> ultrasonic, but very little defect is observed. If a proper
> intensity, frequency and time is taken, there is no risk
> of mechanical damage. Also the original MIL
> longer cycle times.
> 3.4 Air bubbling
> This agitation is very effective, especially for
> equalizing the concentration of impurities after they
> have been removed from the surface. It can be used as
> the consequent after Ultrasonic agitation, hut in the
> next cycle a de-gassing procedure must follow.
> 3.5 Temperature
> Increasing the temperature is a common means to
> speed-up dissolving. Some agent requires specific
> temperatme range (micro-emulsion process 20-50°C).
> In some cases, increasing of temperature might cause
> worse cleaning results. (white residues or damaged
> solder resist). White residues might be resulting due to
> polymeration of resin in higher temperatures instead of
> dissolving them)
> 4. MACHINES FOR CLEANING
> Apart of different other cleaning tasks , which are
> mainly cleaning of machines and tools, cleaning
> substrates after soldering and stencils for solder paste
> and glue printing is a major application, which uses
> machines.
> The main problem building of machines for
> cleaning is, that every application is slightly different.
> This is caused by many factors. Different material of
> cleaned parts, different chemistry used, different.
> soldering parameters (cause different grade of
> polymeration of synthetic resin , which fluxes
> contains), different capacity.
> standards, which prohibits US cleaning is no valid any
> more and new lF'C standards does not speak about
> such ban.
> Therefore to build a good machine, with perfect
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2