LEADFREE Archives

March 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Prop 65
From:
Charles Dolci <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:16:13 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
Oh, sorry. I think I forgot to answer MA/NY DDave's question about the
300 ppm as the threshold level for lead.
I think it was just part of the settlement agreement and set at a level
that the producers could live with without a lot of work or expense.
My take on it is that since the Mateel Group was just after the money,
once they got that I don't think they cared about the rest.  They know
darn well that no one was ever in any danger from the cables and wires.

Regards
Chuck

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2