LEADFREE Archives

March 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David D. Hillman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:36:01 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 kB) , CMAP paper.pdf (1 MB)
Hi James! Hey, I finally finished the BGA paper - here is a copy for your
files. Don't let this out of bag until after May 26 - that's when I present
it at the conference. I would welcome you thoughts on the investigation
too.

(See attached file: CMAP paper.pdf)
Dave



             James Vincent
             <james.vincent@BO
             OKHAM.COM>                                                 To
             Sent by: Leadfree         [log in to unmask]
             <[log in to unmask]                                          cc
             >
                                                                   Subject
                                       Re: [LF] SnBi as components coating
             01/25/2005 04:11
             AM


             Please respond to
                "(Leadfree
                Electronics
             Assembly Forum)"
             <[log in to unmask]
             >; Please respond
                    to
               James Vincent
             <james.vincent@BO
                OKHAM.COM>






All

Just to flag something that we saw way back when in the IDEALS project.  We
looked at SAC + (2% & 5%)Bi solder and found that joints to Alloy 42 QFP
leads suffered an early, almost adhesive, failure at only a few hundred
cycles whereas the Bi-free solder was lasting thousands.  The mechanism is
well described by Kariya - this is the 1st page of one of the papers
http://doc.tms.org/ezMerchant/prodtms.nsf/ProductLookupItemID/JEM-9911-1263/

$FILE/JEM-9911-1263F.pdf?OpenElement

Of course the Bi content above was far higher overall than would come from
Bi only in the component finish, but it would be reassuring to know that
the
(Alloy 42 + SnBi finish + SAC solder) combination is either OK in practice
or now non-existent.  Can anyone confirm?

Jim

James H Vincent
Lead Engineer, Reliability Engineering
Bookham, Caswell
+44 (0)1327 356318


-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 24 January 2005 19:30
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] SnBi as components coating

Ofer,

From what I've read, (short answer) there is the
potential for problems but they may not actually show
up.

Longer answer:  Bismuth does form a very
low-temperature-melting point alloy when combined with
tin AND lead.  The one document I glanced at before
writing this e-mail said 138 C, but I am pretty sure I
have heard figures like 92 C also.
     However, the counter-argument I have seen is that
when SnBi is a component finish, the Bismuth is only
present in pretty low percentages (like 4-5%, I think
??).  There is a not a huge volume of solder involved
in the surface finish anyway, especially not in
comparison with the volume of solder to make a joint
between the PCB pad and the component.  Therefore,
even with an SnBi finish, the actual percentage of
Bismuth in the end solder joint will not be high
enough to cause the low temperature melting point
concerns.

I haven't heard anything about Bismuth affecting the
reliability of the joint, so I would think the best
test would be a worst-case temperature test - maximum
rated ambient, unit powered on and configured such
that SnBi-finished components get maximum heating.
This may take multiple configurations depending on how
many components there are in the product and how many
operating modes the product has.

     Hopefully there will be replies from people on
the list who have had actual experience with this
issue.  I think all the literature I have seen to date
said that it could be an issue, but I don't remember
seeing any case studies where it actually WAS an
issue.

-Camille Good
Portland, Oregon

--- Ofer Cohen <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hello all,
> Some of our vendors suggest their components with
> SnBi coating. Some of them suggest only this finish.
> Although this finish is lead-free, it is being
> assembled (currently) using SnPb paste. Are there
> any known problems? Is there any effect on short
> time or long time reliability?
>
> Regards
> Ofer Cohen
> Manager
> Quality Assurance, Reliability and Production
> Technologies
> Seabridge Ltd. - A Siemens Company
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---Leadfee
> Mail List provided as a service by IPC using
> LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
> with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
> To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for
> vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
> Search previous postings at:
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
> additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at
> [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send:
SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee
 Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send:
SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ATOM RSS1 RSS2