TECHNET Archives

February 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Harman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Harman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:16:54 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
 Can anyone help me understand the difference between gold immersion and
the new technologies (OSP) ORGANIC SOLDERABILITY PRESERVATION,  my
understanding is OSP, immersion silver and immersion tin are the leading
lead-free alternatives.  

 My vendor is asking us to change from a gold immersion to this OSP
process. What are the positives and or negatives for this process? What
do I need to look for? Are there any limitations that may affect RF
performance?  Is this process better then gold immersion and if so why?
Comparing OSP to immersion silver or immersion tin, Is this the
direction of the industry? What about reliability?  

 

Any assistance in this would be helpful.

 

Thanks

David

 


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2