TECHNET Archives

January 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jack C. Olson" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jack C. Olson
Date:
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:52:26 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
I'm not sure if I understand your question,
(or if anyone else has answered already),
but I don't think the component area of ANY
type of assembly is intended to flex.

That's why the rigid areas are there under the
components, so no stress on solder joints.
Even pure flex circuits have stiffeners under
the component areas, from my experience.

So I wouldn't ever flex the rigid part of an assembly.

If that wasn't what you meant, write back, ok?

Jack






   Date:         Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:22:28 -0600
   Reply-To:     TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>,
                 "Simms, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
   Sender:       TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
   From:         "Simms, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
   Subject:      FW: Flexible vs. rigid substrates
   X-To:         "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"



   > Hello T'Netters,
   > Recently, the issue of the use of rigid printed wiring boards in an
   > application
   > which demands that printed wiring boards be pressed into an outer
   shell
   > with some
   > degree of curvature has surfaced.
   > I'm accustomed to the use of flexible substrates for applications
   which
   > demand
   > any form of application in which the board does not stay flat.
   > However, I don't see any IPC document which mandates the use of rigid
   > boards
   > for 180-degree assembly applications and flex boards (or rigid-flex)
   for
   > anything else.
   > Are there any guidelines for the selection of one type over another?
   > Are there any reliability issues with the use of surface mount devices
   on
   > flex boards which don't also apply to rigid boards?
   > Why would a manufacturer opt for a rigid board over a flex board for
   > assemblies which
   > are subsequently flexed?  Is this a choice based on cost?

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2