TECHNET Archives

January 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Edward Szpruch <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Edward Szpruch <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 08:34:33 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (189 lines)
Hi Gabi,
Some time ago I attended seminar on joints reliability in lead-free era. As
PCB manufacturer I have limited knowledge on assembly etc, but this seminar
left me breathless, especially the part on re-works : uncertain data on
composition of finishings on leads, no enough data on solder paste , doubts
on quality of finishing on PCB, unwashed flux, questions on reflow profile.
Our life will be more interesting that it used to be, it for sure this will
be not fun.

You should address your question to the people that set Lead Free
milestones.
Regards
Edward

> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Gabriela Bogdan
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 11:12 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Lead-free Wave Solder Pot Impurity Levels
> 
> 
> Dear friends!
> With the overwhelming amount of information about disinformation
> concerning
> leadfree, I am ashamed to confess that I lost my way.
> I try to be GOOD, but I don't know anymore what it means concerning this
> subject.Once we had clear instructions, and I was GOOD following them.
> Today
> we have so much "IF"s, "BUT"s, and "MAYBE"s concerning reliability, who is
> responsible-for what-, and so on.
> Soon we will shift to leadfree. We will give the consumers what we are
> asked
> for. But is our conscience at peace?
> I just can not understand how and why rules are imposed before the
> solution
> to all the problems are found, and if not, openly stated as being there
> and
> brought to the knowledge of the customers and consumers.
> I would like to know at least how and according to what one will be
> qualified for leadfree products beside the requirements for the materials.
> Will the reliability tests remain the same for the future products as they
> were until now for lead containing products?
> Gaby
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David D. Hillman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 3:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [TN] Lead-free Wave Solder Pot Impurity Levels
> 
> 
> > Hi Leland! Unfortunately the industry is going to need some time to
> develop
> > the wave solder pot impurity level table you are seeking. A fair portion
> of
> > the industry is using the current JSTD-001 impurity level table (user
> > modified for the increased tin, silver, and copper levels) and closely
> > monitoring their impurity levels. I would recommend that you work
> closely
> > with your solder supplier as they have visibility into the status/trends
> of
> > existing wave solder processes to whom they supply solder. Here is a
> > relevant reference on some wave solder impurity levels that may be of
> > interest:
> >
> > “Development and Validation of LeadFree Wave Soldering Process”, A.
> Forsten
> > etal, Soldering & Surface Mount Technology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2000
> >
> > The short term solution is that the industry just needs time to
> understand
> > the potential changes to the JSTD-001 impurity limits that Pbfree solder
> > usage may induce. Good Luck.
> >
> > Dave Hillman
> > Rockwell Collins
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >              Leland Woodall
> >              <lwoodall@CSTECH-
> >              INC.COM>
> To
> >              Sent by: TechNet          [log in to unmask]
> >              <[log in to unmask]>
> cc
> >
> >
> Subject
> >              01/21/2005 05:26          [TN] Lead-free Wave Solder Pot
> >              AM                        Impurity Levels
> >
> >
> >              Please respond to
> >               TechNet E-Mail
> >                    Forum
> >              <[log in to unmask]>
> >              ; Please respond
> >                     to
> >               Leland Woodall
> >              <lwoodall@CSTECH-
> >                  INC.COM>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I have a small dilemma here.  There is a standard for eutectic solder
> pot
> > impurity levels, but I can't seem to find one for lead-free.  Is there
> > such an animal?
> >
> > Everything I've researched on the Web shows only recommendations, namely
> > from Alpha and AIM.  Those two have slight disagreements.
> >
> > At least they provide something, and that is impressive.
> >
> > It also appears that the major concern is processing problems versus
> > product reliability.  If copper content gets too high, the wave solder
> > viscosity becomes too high and bogs down the mechanical parts of the
> > machine.
> >
> > When things get out of whack, can I expect reliability problems as well?
> >
> > What levels of impurities would cause premature joint failure,
> > specifically?
> >
> > Are we too new to this, and have tests not yet been agreed upon?  Is IPC
> > addressing the issue?
> >
> > Any help you could provide would be sincerely appreciated.
> >
> > Offline comments are welcomed.
> >
> > Many, many thanks,
> >
> > Leland Woodall
> > Quality Coordinator
> >
> > Keihin Carolina System Technology, Inc.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
> in
> > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> > To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> > [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> > To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> > [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> > Search the archives of previous posts at:
> http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> > Please visit IPC web site
> http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> > for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
> or
> > 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
> 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2