TECHNET Archives

January 2005

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David D. Hillman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:40:20 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Hi Leland! Unfortunately the industry is going to need some time to develop

the wave solder pot impurity level table you are seeking. A fair portion of

the industry is using the current JSTD-001 impurity level table (user

modified for the increased tin, silver, and copper levels) and closely

monitoring their impurity levels. I would recommend that you work closely

with your solder supplier as they have visibility into the status/trends of

existing wave solder processes to whom they supply solder. Here is a

relevant reference on some wave solder impurity levels that may be of

interest:



“Development and Validation of LeadFree Wave Soldering Process”, A. Forsten

etal, Soldering & Surface Mount Technology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2000



The short term solution is that the industry just needs time to understand

the potential changes to the JSTD-001 impurity limits that Pbfree solder

usage may induce. Good Luck.



Dave Hillman

Rockwell Collins

[log in to unmask]









                                                                           

             Leland Woodall                                                

             <lwoodall@CSTECH-                                             

             INC.COM>                                                   To 

             Sent by: TechNet          [log in to unmask]                     

             <[log in to unmask]>                                          cc 

                                                                           

                                                                   Subject 

             01/21/2005 05:26          [TN] Lead-free Wave Solder Pot      

             AM                        Impurity Levels                     

                                                                           

                                                                           

             Please respond to                                             

              TechNet E-Mail                                               

                   Forum                                                   

             <[log in to unmask]>                                             

             ; Please respond                                              

                    to                                                     

              Leland Woodall                                               

             <lwoodall@CSTECH-                                             

                 INC.COM>                                                  

                                                                           

                                                                           









Hi Folks,



I have a small dilemma here.  There is a standard for eutectic solder pot

impurity levels, but I can't seem to find one for lead-free.  Is there

such an animal?



Everything I've researched on the Web shows only recommendations, namely

from Alpha and AIM.  Those two have slight disagreements.



At least they provide something, and that is impressive.



It also appears that the major concern is processing problems versus

product reliability.  If copper content gets too high, the wave solder

viscosity becomes too high and bogs down the mechanical parts of the

machine.



When things get out of whack, can I expect reliability problems as well?



What levels of impurities would cause premature joint failure,

specifically?



Are we too new to this, and have tests not yet been agreed upon?  Is IPC

addressing the issue?



Any help you could provide would be sincerely appreciated.



Offline comments are welcomed.



Many, many thanks,



Leland Woodall

Quality Coordinator



Keihin Carolina System Technology, Inc.



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------


ATOM RSS1 RSS2