DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

January 2005

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gary Koven <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:30:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (135 lines)
Chris,

To clarify, I'm interested in the width of the web itself, which would be
created by the fabricator per instructions given by the assembler.

Thanks,
Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris
Ball
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 11:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [DC] Web routing widths

Hi Gary-
Just to be clear (I'm kinda slow sometimes), are you interested in:
the router bit dia. the boardshop uses to define the board outline (except
for the attachment points),
the router bit dia. the assembly house uses when singulating your PCB from
the array,
the width of the web itself,
or all of the above?

I ask because I've seen all kinds of combinations of everything and want to
understand the responses you get.

For what it's worth, I now use a 2MM slot width, with 3 or 5MM web
depending on how far apart the webs are. Seems to be sort of a european
std....

Best Regards,
-Chris





                       Gary Koven
                       <[log in to unmask]>         To:
[log in to unmask]
                       Sent by: DesignerCouncil          cc:
                       <[log in to unmask]>         Subject:    [DC]
Web routing widths

                       01/26/2005 11:00 AM
                       Please respond to
                       "(Designers Council
                       Forum)"; Please respond to
                       Gary Koven







Forgive me if this seems arcane, but we've become interested in the
different web routing widths that our assemblers are telling their
fabricators to use to panelize/depanelize our boards.  We've seen 0.125
inch, 0.093 inch, 0.062 inch, and 0.050 inch wide webs thus far.

1. Is there one IPC standard, or a combination of IPC standards, which
specifies preferred web routing widths?

2. How does an assembler determine a "sweet spot" for each preferred web
routing width whereby the individual boards will depanelize most easily?

3. Which preferred web routing width yields the lowest cost route?


Best Regards,

======================
Gary M. Koven, C.I.D.
Engineering Services Manager
Dynazign, Inc.
806 Tyvola Road, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28217
P: 704.405.1234 x210
F: 704.405.1402
http://www.dynazign.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET
DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----




"This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the intended
recipient(s).
The information contained therein may be confidential or privileged, and
its disclosure or reproduction is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please return it immediately to its
sender at the above address and destroy it."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET
DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2