Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:22:28 -0600 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
X-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Hello T'Netters,
> Recently, the issue of the use of rigid printed wiring boards in an
> application
> which demands that printed wiring boards be pressed into an outer shell
> with some
> degree of curvature has surfaced.
> I'm accustomed to the use of flexible substrates for applications which
> demand
> any form of application in which the board does not stay flat.
> However, I don't see any IPC document which mandates the use of rigid
> boards
> for 180-degree assembly applications and flex boards (or rigid-flex) for
> anything else.
> Are there any guidelines for the selection of one type over another?
> Are there any reliability issues with the use of surface mount devices on
> flex boards which don't also apply to rigid boards?
> Why would a manufacturer opt for a rigid board over a flex board for
> assemblies which
> are subsequently flexed? Is this a choice based on cost?
>
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|