TECHNET Archives

December 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Victor G. Hernandez" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:09:55 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (97 lines)
In my experience it was determined that the geometry of the trace versus
the direction of how the panel was suspended during the oxide formation
and length of time before rinse attacked individual traces.   The
artifact was recreated and resolved.  ie narrow width, dish/nick downs.

Victor,

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Valerie St.Cyr
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 9:00 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Resistive internal layers

Here's a thought: if all the tracks on a particular layer exhibit high
resistance then likely that layer was either reworked or may have
excessive oxide treatment. If, however, it is only the one track, then
the
problem is with the track itself. In the past we have found that a
"dishdown" or nick or "mousebite", anything that reduces the volume of
copper in a spot on the track is now a "bottleneck" that increases the
line resistance. The other possibility is that a via in that net has low
copper or copper voiding, which would also show up as high resistance on
the net.

To really root cause the problem would require doing some cross-sections
...

Good luck and let us know what you find.

Regards, Valerie




R Sedlak <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
12/12/2004 08:54 PM
Please respond to TechNet E-Mail Forum; Please respond to R Sedlak


        To:     [log in to unmask]
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: [TN] Resistive internal layers
Phil:  You are probably on the right track looking at the oxide.

Since the assembly people are so fixed on the appearance of the
oxide...(sigh), the fabricators may re-run panels down the oxide line if
they come out initially looking "weird"... Each time they are run down
the
modern "alternate" oxide line, they lose about 2 microns (80
microinches)
of Copper.  Would this cause the problem you are seeing?

Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical Company

DUTTON Phil <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hello Technetters,

We have a multilayer board that is exhibiting higher than expected
resistance on an internal layer track.
The track is 0.006" and about 1.5 inches long, yet has a resistance of
approximately 1 ohm. From what we can tell, the track has not been over
etched. I'm wondering if anyone can shed some light on what could be the
cause of this. I'm thinking that the layer may have had an excessive
'black oxide'treatment to promote adhesion. Is this possible?

thanks,


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2