TECHNET Archives

December 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Connie Korth <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:59:18 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
        Good AM Techies,

        We have some resistors that did not take the tinning all the way to the
body.  There is some copper exposed by the body, but the lead in the solder
connection is good.  Per IPC-610, if copper is exposed due to deformation
or nicks/gouges >10%, it is a defect.  We have absolutely no deformation in
these component leads.  My decision was to leave them in the board.  We
have a Mfg. Engineer who wants to have them all replaced.  He feels I have
interpreted the IPC-610 incorrectly.  I feel that this is unnecessary
rework that could damage the PCB.  Any supporters out there?

        Connie M. Korth
        Quality Specialist
        Reptron Manufacturing Services, Hibbing
        [log in to unmask]
        218.262.8209

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2