TECHNET Archives

December 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dehoyos, Ramon" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Dehoyos, Ramon
Date:
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:45:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)


	Instead of collectively jumping off the cliff, I was thinking of following the leader at full speed ahead knowing that we eventually will jump off the cliff and not stopping because it is mandated to follow the leader. Hoping that perhaps some one will order the mad race to stop. The bigger the manufacturing industry (i.e. USA) the more it stands to loose.

	Regards,

	Ramon

	





-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Dale Ritzen

Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 10:19 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Lead-free, and not lead-free...





Hi Joyce,

I'm going to jump in here even though "unbidden"...



Simple answer - reliability. No one knows the long term effect on product

reliability using the new non-leaded solder in electronic circuit junctions.

Some reports from the first wide-spread use of non-leaded solders do NOT

reflect a high reliability rate in these junctions. Personal opinion

follows: That's why things medical or military are not rushing into this.

When cell phones start "not working" after only 2-years of use and the

reason is found to be weak/poor no-lead solder joints, it really doesn't

paint a good picture for placing someone's life support, business network or

defense systems in this predicament.



Bottom line: There are no long term reliability studies that prove the

worthiness of the non-leaded solders. Indeed, there are some studies that

would lead one NOT to put a lot of faith in this new "environmentally safe"

solder mix. And, on top of that, there are no long term studies on the

effect of the new solder waste (tin, bismuth, silver, etc.) in the

environment. It would appear that we are collectively jumping off the cliff

again and hoping that there are soft bushes at the bottom to break our

fall...



Respectfully,

Dale Ritzen

Quality Manager

AMS



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Joyce Koo

Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 8:36 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Lead-free, and not lead-free...





Chris,

could you let me know why medical and mil are exempt?  why CRT is exempt?

Thanks.

                             jk



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Hughes, Chris

Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 5:36 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Lead-free, and not lead-free...





OK so you guys are going to have major issues if and when you change over to

lead free operations. Which we can sympathise with, but the longer you leave

it the more hurdles you will encounter.



I have been tracking the development of market and legislative drivers

surrounding the electronics industry for the past three years, so I know a

fair bit about the ways out of compliance with lead-free etc.



I'll let you all in on a big secret, unless your products are exempt there

are not ways out!



The bottom line is that legislative drivers such as the WEEE & RoHS pose the

biggest ever threat to the electronics industry because their no escape, and

the domino effect has already started (Japanese corporate polices,

California & Maine Consumer products targeted etc).



And YES it's only going to get worse.



FACT: As we move towards key dates the value of leaded materials used in

electronic & electrical equipment will increase, and will much harder to

obtain.



FACT: If your refuse to go 'lead-free' (RoHS compliant) for products put on

the EU market after July 2006, your products could be banned from sale

across the EU.



Start taking the drive to reduce toxic material inclusion in the electronics

industry seriously, and make sure the resources are in place to ensure you

remain competitive.



This is not simply an issue of greening the electronics supply chain, it is

a major business threat to everybody in the supply chain to the final

products put on sale, both business to householder, and business to

business.



FALSE: Only consumer products will be affected by the legislative driver to

switch over to 'lead-free'.



I welcome all thoughts and additional suggestions.



Chris



Christopher Hughes

Environmental Scientist

[log in to unmask]







-----Original Message-----

From: Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Sent: 07 December 2004 07:57

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Lead-free, and not lead-free...



Mike,



blessed be the innocent, that have not yet seen the dark side..



Inge



PS. we are still unaware, have seen no problems until this day...will the

heaven suddenly

fall upon our heads (Majestix of Gallia)





-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Mike Fenner

Sent: den 6 december 2004 14:57

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Lead-free, and not lead-free...





You will need excellent controls, preferably even a separate building ?.

Customer feedback is that trying to run two lines adjacently, usually in the

interim to full change over can be a hair loosing experience, with frequent

cross over, and do not wish it on others. A single bar of solder can tip

your wave pot over the 0.1% Pb level, putting leaded paste on the unleaded

line can be undetectable [unless you have a handy spectrometer], putting

leaded components on the unleaded line may damage them thermally and so on.



Regards



Mike Fenner

Indium Corporation



T: + 44 1908 580 400

M: + 44 7810 526 317

F: + 44 1908 580 411

E: [log in to unmask]

W: www.indium.com

Pb-free: www.Pb-Free.com





-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory

Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 1:21 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [TN] Lead-free, and not lead-free...





Hi All!



I've got a problem that I've been worrying about all weekend. It may come

to

pass that we will be building both lead-free, and standard 63/37

stuff...whoa is me.



I'm interested in stories from those that have done that...what the hell

did

you do?



Is this something that can be done? It probably can, but me, being the

pessimistic sort, thinks that you're just asking for trouble when you try to

mix

the two...



-Steve Gregory



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------





:::::::::::::::::::::::::::



This email, its content and any files transmitted with it are intended

solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged and/or

confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please delete and

contact the sender by return and delete the material from any computer. Any

review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any

action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than

the intended recipient is prohibited.



Messages sent via this medium may be subject to delays, non-delivery and

unauthorized alteration. This email has been prepared using information

believed by the author to be reliable and accurate, but Indium Corporation

makes no warranty as to accuracy or completeness. In particular, Indium

Corporation does not accept responsibility for changes made to this email

after it was sent. Any opinions or recommendations expressed herein are

solely those of the author. They may be subject to change without notice.





:::::::::::::::::::::::::::



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16

for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------


ATOM RSS1 RSS2