LEADFREE Archives

December 2004

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"James, Chris" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 08:36:50 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (110 lines)
John,

The answer to your question is the holy grail of many of us in a similar

situation who manufacturer "low volume" high end professional products.



Having pursued a definitive answer since the publication of the

directives we have found no one willing to give such. "The courts will

decide" is the usual answer.



What we have been told by people best placed to know is that the

categories are purely for example and "consumer" does not necessarily

mean what it generally is interpreted as. The best answer so far is that

unless you can see your products specifically classified as exempt then

you should consider yourself in and obligated.



The other arguments are that for B2B products the cost of complying with

WEEE will be significantly less than fighting any legal action. Unless

you manufacture and market directly yourself in the EU then it will be

your importers and distributors who will be obligated under WEEE, but

again at a B2B level and where under most circumstances the obligation

can be passed on to the purchaser. (Do you belong to PALMA or any other

trade association?)



For RoHS, the reality is that components will become Pb-F/RoHS compliant

and so you will be more or less forced down the compliant route so again

it is possibly better to go with the flow now rather than face legal

action or possible import bans for non compliancy. In addition more and

more of the world will come on board with such legislation; China

intends to match the EU if not precede the EU by 6 months with very

similar legislation.



A bitter pill to swallow it is. Ill informed politicians have put us in

this position without proper answers or any forethought to the wide

reaching implications on the manufacturing community.



The Japanese have again led the way in business acumen, with a

reasonable step by step process towards reducing the impact of

electronic waste. If only Europe had looked to their

approach............ but then the politicians never learn.



Regards,

Chris

____________________________________________________ 

Chris James

Engineering Services Manager 

Dolby Laboratories, Inc.

Direct: +44 1793 842136







-----Original Message-----

From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Thorup, John

Sent: 07 December 2004 01:18

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [LF] scope of directives



Having just read the directives from beginning to end I have a question

about the scope of the directives.  Article 2 paragraph 1 of the RoHS

directive 2002/95/EC states... "this directive shall apply to electrical

and

electronic equipment falling under the categories 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

and 10

set out in annex 1A to directive No 2002/96/EC (WEEE) and to electric

light

bulbs, and luminaries in households."



In reading WEEE we find these products to be household appliances,

telecom,

consumer equipment, lighting, tools, toys and such.



If this is true would not an OEM of niche, high end, professional

broadcast

equipment that has absolutely no market or application in any household

be

exempt?

Thanks, John



------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV

1.8d

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text

in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree

To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks

send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)

Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site

http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional

information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100

ext.2815

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------







-----------------------------------------

This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential

information intended for a specific individual and purpose.  If you are not

the intended recipient, delete this message.  If you are not the intended

recipient, disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any action based on

this m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
essage is strictly prohibited.



ATOM RSS1 RSS2