DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

December 2004

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kitty Hines <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Thu, 9 Dec 2004 07:15:59 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
All I can tell you is that I've used via in pad on a very tight board once.  We didn't have any problems with it, but I do hear that there can be an issue with flatness.  If you have a reliable board house that can deal with this process, it shouldn't be a problem.  I wouldn't try to put it thru the solder wave, and I'd make the vias part of the cap pads to avoid drc errors.
Good Luck with it!

-----Original Message-----
From: DesignerCouncil [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Gary
Boccoleri
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 7:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [DC] FW: Bypass caps under BGAs using via in pad


pad

Hi All,

I'm looking at a spec for a new processor we may be using. They
recommend using via in pad and show a diagram of how to place 0402
bypass caps right on the vias under the chip. Has anybody done this?
This brings up a few questions. Since 2 adjacent vias will form the
footprint for the caps, should I make the bottom pad of the via a square
that approximates the pads I normally use on these caps? How do I place
the caps without creating DRCs? Will our assembly house be completely
dumbfounded when they see this? Is this whole idea just a figment of
some engineers imagination with no basis in reality?

Thanks for all help 

Gary Boccoleri
Bivio Networks
925-924-8621
www.bivio.net
 


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you.**

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2