TECHNET Archives

November 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reuven ROKAH <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:44:07 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (129 lines)
Another issue,

The Tin/Pb components and systems stocks the companies will still have in
their warehouse on July 2006 are also not so friendly to
environment......and to P&L balance sheet....

Best  Regards

Reuven  ROKAH




                      Guy Ramsey
                      <gramsey@RDCIRCU         To:      [log in to unmask]
                      ITS.COM>                 cc:
                      Sent by: TechNet         Subject: Re: [TN] Lead Free is not Free, is Costly
                      <[log in to unmask]
                      >


                      19/11/2004 20:40
                      Please respond
                      to gramsey





Did anyone discuss the impact on plastic parts, and epoxy boards. What
board
laminate take multiple cycles above 240?C?
Or are we still living under the illusion that you can maintain a 5 degree
temperature delta across densely designed boards with modern wacko packages
and stay below 235?

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Blair K. Hogg
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:27 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Lead Free is not Free, is Costly


I agree wholeheartedly.

I attended a seminar yesterday at Villanova University where Jim McElroy of
NEMI, Karl Seelig of AIM, Dennis Barbini of Vitronics Soltec and Jack
Geibig
of the Center for Clean Products and Clean Technologies at the University
of
Tennessee were presenters.

The primary take-aways were:

1. It is going to cost everyone more to manufacture lead-free products, due
to more expensive solder, higher energy requirements in processes, etc.

2. The reliability of lead-free solders and connections made with these
solders has not been proven.

And the most interesting part was that the study conducted by U of Tenn
showed that the use of SAC solders causes more harm to the environment than
the use of SnPb.

The UT website relating to this is at:
http://eerc.ra.utk.edu/ccpct/lfsp-projectinfo.html however, the results of
the study are not yet available there.

Blair

>>> [log in to unmask] 11/19/04 12:36PM >>>


        Good artlicle. A beginning of a movement in the right direction?






*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.

www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2