TECHNET Archives

November 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Ingemar Hernefjord (KC/EMW)
Date:
Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:48:52 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
I'm just now working with a missile unit that demands several hundred G's withstanding during some parts of a second. Nothing remarkable with that. Ordinary teflon boards, ordinary chips and small outline components, ordinary soldering of caps and other components. The rule is that all parts are steadily backed up or supported by heavy and strong metal constructions. And all parts are travelling steadily pressed against seat. Think of 'Space Mountain' in LA Disneyworld. The vechicle starts by means of some pressurized air unit, like sitting in a fully mounted Porsche. And all are sitting in the travel direction. At least when I visited it many hundred years ago. Or all these catapults all around the world, shooting youngsters right up in the air with hydraulics. None are hanging, all are pressed against seat. So, talking electronics, not so remarkable. Many ordinary chip components and small outline packagages withstand 10,000 G's ! Don't allow least unsupported part of the !
 board! And...no wet caps! And no free wires! Not a mm.

Advice: speak with the Myth Busters...

Ingemar Hernefjord
Ericsson Microwave Systems


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
Sent: den 18 november 2004 21:37
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Assemblies built to withstand very high G-loads...


Afternoon All!

This is just a general question concerning assemblies that are built to withstand very, very high G-loads. G-loads that are much higher than airborn avionics, or even missiles. Is there any special processes that would need to be considered that would be radically different than what are used to build airborn avionics and/or missile electronics? If you can't talk about it I understand...

-Steve Gregory-

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2