TECHNET Archives

November 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Colin McVean <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:03:54 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (157 lines)
Ingemar,

Just kind of curious as to how your diving friends might make or answer that
call!
Blub...glub lol...and it's not quite Friday yet

Regards,

Colin McVean

Circuit Manufacture Ltd
Unit 9-12
Rowleys Green Lane
Longford
Coventry
CV6 6AG

Tel: 02476 666168
Fax: 02476 637089
________________________________________________

This email is confidential and intended solely for the use
of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of the Company.

If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you
have received this email in error and that any use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this
email is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this email in error please notify the
Company by telephone on +44 (0)24 7666 6168 or reply
by email to the sender and delete the email.
________________________________________________

Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that there are
no viruses embedded in this email, we highly recommend
that you virus scan any attached files using your own anti-
virus software.


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Ingemar Hernefjord
(KC/EMW)
Sent: 18 November 2004 09:41
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Alternatives to Conformal Coating?


John,
We studied some units from the car industry. Cheap but efficient way of
making tough electronics.
Seems as your product fits into your category. I would buy thinwall
stainless steel open boxes,
bring that card in and pot with silicon and use a silicon rubber protected
cable to communicate with the
outside. Omit the thought of connectors. The power transistors can be
mounted directly to steel box.
And mount them with open side down. I have a friend who designs the
electronics for handheld motorsaws,
his units can be drowned in petrol, water, oil..anything. Same idea as I
mentioned above.
Simple and cheap..no? Then I have the cheapest of all, used by diving
friends: http://phoneus.ronniebou.net/phone/waterproofelectroniccase.html

Ingemar Hernefjord
Ericsson Microwave Systems



-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of John Parsons
Sent: den 17 november 2004 20:08
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Alternatives to Conformal Coating?


Greetings all,

We are a fab shop and are looking for a solution to a problem being
experienced by one of our customers.  They have a board which resides in a
somewhat hostile environment
        - steam/salt water vapour
        - board carries 20Amp current
        - susceptible to multiple thermal excursions which put further
stress on
the unit
The problem, as one might expect, is that the soldermask is not man enough
for the job.  Some units have exhibited significant solder mask flaking from
the conductors after as little as 4 hours of operation.  FYI, board is
double sided with 3oz base Cu.

The product is currently only in the prototype stage but production volumes
are expected to be in the 100,000-250,000 units annually.  We have proposed
the obvious solution of utilizing a conformal coating post assy but that is
an option they would initially prefer to avoid due to the inherent costs
involved.  They would like us to first exhaust any possibility that the
problem can be averted from the pcb fabrication level.  I should also
mention that the expected lifespan of the unit is a maximum of 1000hrs and
likely only several hundred hours.

Some options that have been discussed are; (in no particular order of
likelihood to succeed of fail!)
        - multiple coating of soldermask
        - micro etch of copper prior to mask application (currently pumice
scrub)
        - conductor pacification with oxide alternative.  If this does not
provide
additional bite for the mask it may provide additional protection from
corrosion once the mask has pealed off.

Any ideas from the lot of you?  Are there properties to specialty solder
masks which might be beneficial in this application?  Any options to
conformal coating??

Regards
John Parsons

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2