TECHNET Archives

November 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:57:45 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Thanks Steve,
This was new to me as well until somebody mentioned it in one of my
workshops. What is bad about 'Champagne Voids' is that they are all concentrated at the
pad/SJ interface, and thus, severely weaken an interface that already has the
smallest cross-section for a BGA SJ.
From my other source, I thought maybe it had something to do with immersion
Ag, but this paper shows it for all surface treatments--thus, it has to be the
copper plating of the PCBs. The Bryant-paper unfortunately shows no
x-sections, but my other source shows all the voids on the PCB side.

Werner

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2