Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 1 Nov 2004 13:01:15 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 03:54 PM 11/1/2004 +0000, you wrote:
>One finding at SEM/EDX was the identification of high levels of Carbon and
>Oxygen - presumably this is an indication of organic contamination?
Long ago and far away we muddled through a similar problem manifest at
least 2 different ways. One on an SMOBC design, another on ENIG then SM.
Here's a couple possible lines of inquiry...
Are these SMOBC then ENIG?
1. If not SMOBC, then perhaps LPI residue remains in the gold -- not fully
developing out of the Au pores. This is we insist on SMOBC with ENIG.
2. If SMOBC, then are vias plugged with LPI after ENIG? If so, maybe a
case of soldermask residue from the plugging operation (esp, if a flood and
develop vs. a dot pattern process)?
cheers,
Dwight
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|