TECHNET Archives

October 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:21:34 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (154 lines)
May this male bovine excreta-style spam be expurged from this board
illico prestissimo. Hopefully Keach will be able to trace your IP number
and ban you forever from all IPC activity for this purely political
conspiracy codswallop, which denigrates those who died in this tragedy.
At least I have the courage to publish this flame under my own name.

Brian

Signer wrote:
> I am a regular contributor to this group, but for what I have to
> say today I prefer to use an alternative emailadress and a fake
> name. I know it is inappropiate to post this here, but given the
> huge importance of the issue and the fact that the
> government-owned media is withhelding this kind of information
> for the public, I decided to post this anyway. This message is
> about the events that took place on the 9th of September of 2001
> and about how the US government is insulting our intelligence
> by expecting us to believe in their "official story" which
> clearly is "the biggest lie ever" as I will show you here:
> The following webpages:
> [1]http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero14/missile/temoins_en.htm
> ,
> [2]http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero14/missile/trou_en.htm an
> d
> [3]http://www.serendipity.li/wtc3.htm demonstrate with good
> quality photographs taken from official US Army websites that
> the official story about the Pentagon attack simply cannot be
> true. The evidence is overwhelming that whatever caused the
> damage to the Pentagon it was not a Boeing 757. If you suspect
> that these photographs are manipulated by "conspiracy nuts" who
> made these websites than do like I did and try to find images on
> the Internet that do show parts of a Boeing 757 lying in the
> rubble. I promise you that you won't find any.
> [4]http://www.prisonplanet.com/012004watson.html proves (by
> showing the owner of the WTC admitting it on TV) that building 7
> of the WTC was taken down by controlled demolition, just a
> couple of hours after the main towers fell. The idea that it is
> possible to organize a controlled demolition within a period of
> a few hours in the middle of a disaster area is insane, so it
> had to be planned before. The story is also in direct
> contradiction to the official FEMA report.
> There is in fact plenty of substantial evidence to be found on
> hundreds of websites that also the two main towers were blown up
> by explosives.
> In the morning of 09-11-01 it was reported on
> [5]http://www.wcpo.com that a Boeing 767 (United Flight 93) out
> of Boston had made an emergency landing at Cleveland Hopkins
> International Airport due to concerns that it may have had a
> bomb aboard. The plane had been moved to a secure area of the
> airport, and was evacuated. Three years after posting the story
> its existence was reported for the first time on national radio.
> Strangely enough a few hours later the story was retracted. Find
> the evidence of this story on:
> [6]http://www.policestate21.com/bomb_threat.html
> This feeds the already strong suspicion that the planes that hit
> the WTC were not the same planes that were reportedly used for
> the attacks.
> All 8 Black Boxes (2 per plane), which are designed to be
> indestructible in the event of a tragedy, were damaged beyond
> use. And still we are asked to believe that one of the hijackers
> brought his passport with him on a domestic fight, even though
> he knew he would not need it then, or ever again; that upon
> impact the passport flew from the hijacker's pocket (or was he
> holding it in his hands?), that the passport flew out of the
> aircraft, that it flew out of the burning tower, and that it was
> carried by the air currents and landed safely, where it could be
> discovered, several blocks away ...
> [7]http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2001/Sep-16-Sun-2001/n
> ews/17011253.html
> According to a recent poll by Zogby International almost half of
> the New Yorkers believe US Leaders had foreknowledge of
> impending 9-11 attacks and consciously failed to act. So why
> didn't we hear about this important outcome on National
> Television or in the newspaper? Seems someone is trying to
> withhold this information from us.
> [8]http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=855
>
> Read all about 8 of the alleged hijackers being alive and well
> after 911 (with links to official news reports):
> [9]http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/alive.html
> A brandnew book by wellknown Michael C. Ruppert
> ([10]http://www.fromthewilderness.com/about.shtml) names Vice
> President Richard Cheney as the prime suspect in the mass
> murders of 9/11 and establishes that, not only was he a planner
> in the attacks, but also on the day of the attacks he was
> running a completely separate Command, Control and
> Communications system which was superceding any orders being
> issued by the FAA, the Pentagon, or the White House Situation
> Room;
>
> Stanley Hilton was a senior advisor to Sen Bob Dole (R) and has
> personally known Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz for decades. This
> courageous man has risked his professional reputation, and
> possibly his life, to get this information out to people. The
> following is from his latest visit to Alex Jones' radio
> show: "This (9/11) was all planned. This was a
> government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order.
> He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason
> and mass murder."
> [11]http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/091204hilton.htm
> Don't take my word for all this but check the links, and see
> what you can find on "official" and other pages. It seems to me
> that the so-called "conspiracy writers" do a much better job in
> providing evidence for their claims than the official
> writers do, and after all the official story tell just another
> conspiracy, one about some Arabic terrorists working together
> with chief-conspirator Osama Bin Laden to attack the US. But I
> repeat: don't take my word for it, that would be just as foolish
> as believing Goverment Officials who tell you that that you
> simply must believe them or otherwise you are unpatriotic and
> one of the bad guys. Search for information, check the facts,
> and see where it leads you.
> Sorry if I wasted your time, I just think you need to know this.
>
> References
>
> Visible links
> 1. http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero14/missile/temoins_en.htm
> 2. http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero14/missile/trou_en.htm
> 3. http://www.serendipity.li/wtc3.htm
> 4. http://www.prisonplanet.com/012004watson.html
> 5. http://www.wcpo.com/
> 6. http://www.policestate21.com/bomb_threat.html
> 7. http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2001/Sep-16-Sun-2001/news/17011253.html
> 8. http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=855
> 9. http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/alive.html
>   10. http://www.fromthewilderness.com/about.shtml
>   11. http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/091204hilton.htm
>
> Hidden links:
>   12. http://www.policestate21.com/bomb_threat.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2