EMBEDDEDNET Archives

October 2004

EmbeddedNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David R McGregor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
D-37 Sub-Committee Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David R McGregor <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:08:06 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:




Rick, Rob Sheffield had shown this argument in the AEPT consortium.  It is
intriguing.  One thing that may also need to be considered is impedance
amplitude in addition to just how much charge can be accessed by the chip.
Note figure 8 in the paper we presented at the 2nd annual EP conference
where software simulation showed an advantage to the higher k even though
the dielectric thickness was the same.  If you were to take the 0.2 micron
thick examples and do the same kind of software simulation it might be very
interesting to see the results.

dave

(See attached file: Polyimide Paper Presented at IPC 040617.doc)

David R. McGregor
Sr. Development Associate
DuPont Co.
14 T. W. Alexander Dr.
Research Triangle Park, NC    27709
Phone: (919) 248-5064
email: [log in to unmask]



             Richard Ulrich
             <[log in to unmask]
             >                                                          To
             Sent by:                  [log in to unmask]
             EmbeddedNet                                                cc
             <[log in to unmask]
             org>                                                  Subject
                                       [EM] CircuiTree Column Draft

             10/12/2004 10:54
             AM


             Please respond to
                   D-37
               Sub-Committee
                   Forum
             <[log in to unmask]
               ORG>; Please
                respond to
              Richard Ulrich
             <[log in to unmask]
                     >






As usual, I'm asking all of you experts out there to be my proofreader.
  This one is a little but "out there" and I'd appreciate your comments.
  I'll be at CARTS/Europe for the next week if I'm slow to respond.

- Rick


[attachment "Ulrich CircuiTree Col 7.doc" deleted by David R
McGregor/AE/DuPont]


******************************************************
Dr. Richard Ulrich
Professor
Dept. of Chemical Engineering
3202 Bell Center
Univ. of Arkansas
Fayetteville, AR   72701

[log in to unmask]
(479) 575-5645
******************************************************




This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under
applicable law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.  Please notify the sender
by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system.  Unless
explicitly and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended",
this e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment,
or an acceptance of a contract offer.  This e-mail does not constitute
a consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing
purposes or for transfers of data to third parties.

 Francais Deutsch Italiano  Espanol  Portugues  Japanese  Chinese  Korean

            http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html



ATOM RSS1 RSS2