TECHNET Archives

September 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Douthit <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:34:25 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines)
Bogert,

You will need to send this photo to a thrid party (Steve Gregory:
[log in to unmask] or Daan Terstegge: [log in to unmask])
and have them post it on their site.

David A. Douthit
Manager
LoCan LLC

- Bogert wrote:

>September 8, 2004
>
>A technical challenge for all you printed wiring board (PWB) manufacturing experts.  Please help.
>
>The attached photographs show conductive contamination trapped under LPI solder mask covered over by Type UR conformal coating (.003 in nominal thickness).
>
>The PWB is a two sided PTH (no SMT parts) board of FR-4 (thickness range is .062 to 0.125 inch depending on the PWB part number) with solder mask applied over bare copper.  The PWB is used in a military application.  The PTH are tin-lead.  The same type contamination has also been found on multi-layer PWB'S.
>
>The photos show what look like tin whiskers (I do not think they are since SEM analysis shows the material as a combination of tin, lead and copper and normally tin whiskers grow only on virgin plating such as pure tin, silver, zinc, etc.).
>
>I have two questions as follows and request your expert opinions in answering the questions:
>
>1) What process or material problem could have caused the conductive filaments to form, and how to prevent it from happening again?  My best guess is contamination residue from the etch-back process.
>
>2) If the PWB passes shorts testing and end-item functional test, is there any concern with continued use in a humid environment given that the contamination is trapped under a layer of solder mask as well as a layer of Type UR conformal coating.
>
>Any info available on how long solder mask and conformal coating can retard moisture entry?  I know that neither material will prevent eventual moisture entry.  Is there any data that shows how long these materials will retard moisture from causing dendrite growth problems?
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
>To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
>the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
>To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
>To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
>Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
>Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
>-----------------------------------------------------
>Any concern for dendrite growth or other no-no's?
>
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2