TECHNET Archives

August 2004

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Bloomquist, Ken" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Bloomquist, Ken
Date:
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 12:53:31 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
Hi Ramon,

We use your proposed method for a lot of things like hardware and some components but in the case of solder it's a little different. We don't want our circuit card assembly houses to use any thing but SN63. I we made SN60 an "every time sub" for SN63 it would not only be for magnetics but for our board assemblies too.

I'd really like to pull SN63 off the parts list and control it with some sort of solderability note.

Thanks,

KennyB

-----Reply Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Dehoyos, Ramon

        Hi Kenny:
        Agree, you should give yourself some wiggle room. An alternate part list drawing will also work. This drawing will affect all drawing. So every time you want to add a part to the drawings all you have to do is add it to the alternate part list. The drawing should have a table of components with two or more columns. On the left the alternate part and on the right of it the parts it is replacing.
        Regards,
        Ramon

-----Original Message-----
>>> [log in to unmask] 08/02/04 11:36AM >>>
I have a question on defining a lead finish on magnetics made by CM's.

On our magnetics design drawings we currently call out SN63 for a lead
finish but we have a contractor that wants to us SN60. We don't have a
problem using SN60 but we'll have to change all our drawings to accept
it. When we change to Lead Free solder in the future we'll have to
change all our drawings again.

I'm wondering if there is a better way to call out a lead finish i.e.
"Lead finish shall be solderable" or something simple like that. Or
maybe there is a spec I can call out.

What do others of you do for specifying lead finish on internally
designed components that are manufactured by a CM?

Thanks to all,

KennyB

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2